Basic Healthcare Service Should be Free to All Cit Essays - Health

Basic Healthcare Service Should be Free to All Cit Essays - Health Basic Healthcare Service Should be Free to All Citizens Mohamad Fikri Nizam Bin Mat Ghani 1412309 Soris Bin Hamadul 1412451 Madam Zuridah Hayati Binti Abdul Hamid Section 5 International Islamic University Malaysia 8 th December 2017 Basic Healthcare Service Should be Free to All Citizens Every living human needs to take care of their lives and health, making that basic healthcare is one of the important aspects in human beings life. The meaning of basic health services is the minimum degree of health care considered to be necessary to maintain adequate health and protection from disease. Basic health service also can be describe as benefits that all federally qualified health maintenance organisations (HMOs) must offer. For example, the diagnose of the patient, use of ambulance and issuance of non-controlled medicine or the medical service that does not need an extensive care such as flu where the patients can go to clinics and leave at the same day. In Malaysia, basic health service are mainly offered and maintained by government, although there exist private hospitals and clinics, public hospitals still the main choice for majority of the citizens. Furthermore, as quote from website of expat.com, "Malaysia offers some of the best healthcare in South-East Asia" (expat, 2011, p. 2). This proves that the Malaysia government have done their best in providing good health care service. However, the health service offered is not free of charges, instead the citizen needs to pay a small fee to get the treatment in public health institution, even if the fees is small and only nominal fees needs to be paid to get healthcare service especially in public clinic the citizen still have to paid for it (expat, 2011). This raise an issue because the citizens have paid the tax and even if they does not receive all health service free of charges they should at least receive basic health service free of charge but that did not happen. The basic healthcare service here are the services such as use of ambulance, diagnosis and issuance of non-controlled medicine which should be free to the citizens because the citizens have already paid the public healthcare through the general taxation of income like income tax (expat, 2011). Thus, it is agreed that basic health care service should be free to all citizens. Furthermore, to strengthen this view the point on the economic, social and psychology perspective will be provided in the following paragraphs. In Economic Perspective, it Increase the Purchasing Power In the Economic perspective, by giving free basic healthcare, it can cause individual buying power to increase because the disposable income will increase. The cost for people to acquire the health care has caused the increase in spending because they have to spend more money for the things related to health making their consumption to be limited (Kumar, 2014). Their limited consumption can be related to the decrease of their disposable income because they have to set aside a portion of their income for health use especially when there are emergencies and also for the precaution in the future. Moreover, according to Keynesian theory, when the disposable incomes of the individuals become lower, it will affect their consumption to be also lower (Riley, 2015). This theory is based on that the miscellaneous consumption of the people will change based on their disposable income, where in this case the income that individuals can use after deducting amount for their responsibilitie s such as paying tax, insurance and emergency precaution. It can be explained that people will consume less if they are worried for the future when there is emergency situation that occurs and the needs to use of money, this situation caused them the need to save the money for the emergency health use of the future. This is because the amount of disposable income will affect the level of consumption of people. Other than that, the economic activity of a country also will become slower or lower because of the low consumption level (Mandel, 2011). According to both Classical economic theory developed by Karl Marx and Keynesian economic theory that been developed by an English economist, John Maynard Keynes , it also mentioned that the level of consumption of

Free Essays on Limits Of Christian Freedom

to others, including men), since the gospel means freedom from those traditions and from the judgment of the divine law (Galatians 5:11). One must reckon with the radical nature of the gospel t... Free Essays on Limits Of Christian Freedom Free Essays on Limits Of Christian Freedom Limits But to the one who â€Å"demands† that something in addition to faith in Christ is necessary for righteousness and salvation, one must assert the â€Å"Christ alone- faith alone† gospel. For example, to the one who argues that certain foods should be avoided because the eating of them is contrary to the law of God or to the one who demands that one must observe the sabbath according to the traditions of the elders or that one must use a particular form of liturgy, one must assert the gospel of the all-sufficiency of Christ’s gospel. The assertion of this gospel causes offense. So the Pharisees are â€Å"offended† by Jesus’ statement that all foods are clean (Matthew 15:12), thus undermining the Jewish concept of purity. Some â€Å"take offense† at Jesus’ words (Matthew 13:57; John 6:61); others take offense at Jesus’ freedom in relation to the law (Mark 2:23; 3:1ff.) or to his sharp distinction between human traditions and Godâ €™s commands (Matthew 15:3). Because of this gospel ministry and the offense it causes, it is not surprising that skandalon and its cognates in the New Testament (30 times) are used more often for those who are â€Å"offended† or â€Å"scandalized† to the point of unbelief by the gospel message and the person of Jesus! And the ultimate â€Å"offense/scandal†: a crucified Christ (1 Corinthians 1:23; Galatians 5:11). It is no wonder that Jesus states, â€Å"Blessed is he who is not offended/scandalized by me† (Matthew 11:6). The gospel that means freedom is also a scandal to those who insist on the necessity of the old rules and regulations (e.g., foods, sabbath, circumcision; but even the apostolic rules regarding food offered to idols!- and, one might add, their rules about women proclaiming the divine words to others, including men), since the gospel means freedom from those traditions and from the judgment of the divine law (Galatians 5:11). One must reckon with the radical nature of the gospel t...

Rubric for Written Response to Performance of Communicating Doors Essay

Rubric for Written Response to Performance of Communicating Doors - Essay Example The set is great, and cover the entire stage, from the balcony windows to a some feet close to the audience on the left side of the stage further to the door close to the door, and the posh time travel door, to the overt walled washroom, bedroom doorway that has a furnishing accompaniment and the antique additions that are throughout the stage. On stage the couch is tailored for the play, and the audience become perplexed that the exterior in the at time spunky play. The concept of tie travel is rather simple on stage, and during the play there is a door in which it frequently occurs. A mere walk through the door and the cast can land either twenty years in the future or twenty years in the past. The direction in time (future or past) depends on who the cast member might be. However, only a single individual can travel at any given time, further one can come to the present from either the past or the future. In the play the concept is wide and unlimited and the concept of time travelling is captured aptly within the play. The British accent filled the environment, and the players performing in different ages, and hence the need to change their wigs and posture to reflect the change in their ages over the flip sides. The 1978 periods is when some are young, then the age when the play was set as the present, and in the future, 2034 and 2018 is reflected by changes in the age manifested by wigs assuming different colors. The scenery is also frequently captured by the lighting to show different time periods, and the concept is achieved when this is achieved through shifting of the time changing room. To achieve this change seem to take quite a while to be realized, the change, time switch and for the audience to predict what is time, then change in time, and convince the audience that the time has changed and things like that takes time to be achieved. The characters put on very colorful costumes which do not betray the play as they are seem to be fully

"Civil Rights Revolution" Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

"Civil Rights Revolution" - Assignment Example Besides these minority groups’ leaders, the men that were in charge in the White House played a significant role in ensuring the civil rights movement’s success. Prior to his death, John F. Kennedy had been viewed as a keen ear to the minorities’ plight and probably would have instituted the necessary legislations that would have afforded everyone the same rights, had he not been assassinated. Once Lyndon Johnson took over office, he acted fast so as to institute measures and legislations that helped further the civil rights movement. His call for the end of segregation and implementation of laws that permitted the minorities to vote essentially brought the end to the golden era of the civil rights movements. On the other hand, a few events prolonged the fight for equal rights. The assassinations of John F. Kennedy as well as Martin Luther King, Jnr. were such events. Each of these men was an integral part of the struggle and their deaths significantly hampered the efforts. Furthermore, the unhinging determination of government officials such as Bull Connor, who were vehemently against equality, ensured that the any attempts by civil rights movements were quashed when they arose. Such brutality dissuaded a large portion of the minorities’ population from participating actively in the

Post Modernist Director Jim Jarmusch Essay Example for Free

Post Modernist Director Jim Jarmusch Essay Jim Jarmusch is one of the prominent post-modernist directors whose works produced a profound impression on the audience and often evoked quite controversial emotions. His films are very original and convey the authentic message of the author, but the director often chooses such means of conveying his ideas that his works are perceived in different way by different people. In fact, some people enjoy his films and believe they are genius, while, on the other hand, there are people who do not really understand his works and are very critical in relation to his works. At the same time, it should be said that his films are destined not only for specialists but also for the mass audience, though the director’s ideas may be not always clear for ordinary viewers. Nevertheless, the artistic value of his works is practically undeniable. As a rule, his films are stylistically and artistically rich. The director skillfully applies different stylistic devices which help him convey his message to the audience. Among films created by Jim Jarmusch, it is possible to single out his film â€Å"Down by Law†, which depicts the tragedy of main characters who have to pass through serious challenges in the course of the film. At the same time, this film is a perfect sample of post-modernist films, where main characters confront severe reality of the modern world and where it is really difficult to distinguish between good and evil, right and wrong. In his film the author shows that in the epoch of high technologies, there are still a lot of problems which affect the life of ordinary people and make the life very difficult and even tragic. On analyzing the film â€Å"Down by Law† by Jim Jarmusch, it is necessary to start with the title of the film because it gives insight into the contents and message of the film. In fact, the title of the film is quite symbolic, though it is practically directly indicates to the overwhelming power of law and its impact on an individual. The title of the film clearly conveys the message that the law can affect the life of people dramatically and, what is even more important, the law is not always right or good. Basically, it is possible to estimate that Jim Jarmusch attempts to moralize and analyze the relationship between an individual and the law. Judging from the title, the director stands on the ground that the law can oppress an individual, it can deprive a person of freedom and punish severely. In this respect, the events depicted in the film are quite logical and basically support first ideas that the title of the film evoke. To put it more precisely, the main characters, three inmates, Zack, Jack and Bob, are cellmates and the director attempts to show that all of them are innocent and were wrongfully accused of crimes they have never committed. Nevertheless, all of them are sentenced and, therefore, punished by the existing judicial system which executes the law established in the society. In such a way, the author uses the title to prepare the audience to the perception of the film and adequate interpretation of his main message and ideas. It gives insight concerning the problem raised in the film, but, at the same time, the title also creates certain emotional state or mood which prepares the audience to perception of the film in the way the director finds the most suitable. To put it more precisely, the title has quite a negative connotation of the law. Traditionally, the law is associated with justice. The modern society gets used to perceive law as the basis of the social life, since laws regulate relations between people and support the existing social order and social stability. The violation of law naturally leads to the punishment of an individual through which the individual is supposed to be corrected and change his lifestyle and behavior. In other words, the law is viewed as a tool of the adaptation of the behavior of an individual to socially appropriate and acceptable norms. In such a context, the law is viewed as a positive concept since it maintains justice and social stability that are highly appreciated in the modern society. However, the title of the film suggests an alternative view on the law. Implicitly, â€Å"Down by Law† tends to convince the audience that the law is the punishment above all and its power is used to get people down, while there is little indication to any kind of justice in the title of the film. On the contrary, such a title rather produces an impression that the law is not absolutely just, if not to say unjust. In actuality, the title of the film refers probably to one of the major themes of the film – the relationship between a man and the law. Remarkably, the author attempts to show that the law is really oppressive that may be seen from the title of the film. However, such a conclusion is logical and the title is only a tool with the help of which the director conveys this idea. In actuality, the entire film shows that the law, as a tool of human justice, is often blind. Jim Jarmusch shows that the law is not a synonym of justice. In stark contrast, the law is shown as a powerful tool which has little in common with the concept of justice (Jilesen, 236). Even thought the concept of justice is not clearly defined by the director in the film, it is very difficult to get rid of impression that the law is wrong, at least in relation to the main characters, who got their sentences for crimes they had never committed. In actuality, the director manages to show that the concept of law, as a symbol of justice, is very conventional and it seems as if he wants to convince the audience that people should not totally rely on the law and the justice system at large, because there still remains the risk of errors and innocent people can go to prison. At the same time, Jim Jarmusch pays a lot of attention to interpersonal relations between people. In fact, it is even possible to estimate that the director attempts to underline the significance of interpersonal relationships, which can outweigh even the relationship between a man and the law. Unlike the relationship of a man and the law, the relationship between people is not conventional. In stark contrast, they are very personal and people can learn more about each other through communication and, in such a context, decisions of the judicial system made on the basis of law are absolutely irrelevant to people. What is meant here is the fact that the main characters of the film, the three cellmates, could perceive each other as criminals. Formally, all of them were accused and sentenced to different terms. Therefore, they could naturally perceive each other as criminals because the law defined them as criminals. At the beginning of the film, the director actually shows that such stereotyping on the basis of decisions of the judicial system can affect the perception of people. In such a situation, it seems to be quite natural that Zack and Jack soon come to blows because they perceive each other as criminals and, in actuality, their conflict is, to a significant extent, provoked by stereotyping and biased attitudes of Zack and Jack to each other. In fact, it is the biases and stereotypes imposed on them by the law lead them to the conflict. However, the director of the film apparently does not really believe that the law and the existing judicial system is worth trusting. Jim Jarmusch lays emphasis on the importance of interpersonal relationships which actually define the life of people and their perception of each other (Jilesen, 218). In other words, the director puts human relationships consistently higher than any conventional norms or regulations imposed on people by laws, traditions, tc. In fact, it is through the interpersonal relationship between people their nature and character is revealed. In this respect, it should be said that from the point of view of the law all the three inmates are criminals, but through their interpersonal relationships, they reveal the fact that they are not as bad as they seem to be judging from their sentences and crimes they are accused of. On the other hand, the director avoids labeling his main characters as either positive or negative. He wants to show that his characters are real people, they are alive, they have their own feelings, emotions, ideals. Briefly speaking, they are humans and, therefore, they are imperfect. At any rate, Jim Jarmusch does not idealize his characters and shows that they have both positive and negative qualities. At the same time, he shows that the world, society get used to perceive people in such a way, i. e. through the antagonism between good and bad. In this respect, the use of black and white color in the film is very symbolic. Traditionally, good and bad is associated with white and black color respectively. Jim Jarmusch has shot the film in black and white intentionally in order to convey his message to the audience. In fact, it is possible to view his film as a kind of mirror where the traditional perception of the modern world is reflected. To put it more precisely, people get used to perceive each other either positively or negatively, people are either good or bad. Hence, the choice of colors in the film is very original and unusual for the late 1980s, when there were quite a few films shot in black and white. The director attempted to convince the audience that people get used to perceive this world only in two colors (Hertzberg, 175). Therefore, the use of black and white was quite logical since the film just shows people the world in the colors people get used to perceive the world in. In such a way, the director also warns people about the danger of the loss of other colors since, on perceiving the life through the antagonism of black and white, bad and good, wrong and right, people forget about intermediary states and other colors and concepts. In such a context, when black and white dominates in the film, it is the complexity of interpersonal relationships of the main characters that makes the film really colorful and bright. And again it is possible to speak about a profound attention of the author to interpersonal relations between people which are extremely important to each individual. Moreover, it is relationships with other people that make human life purposeful and brings in certain sense. However, the director creates quite an unusual relationship between the main characters. For instance, Zack and Jack do not speak to each other after the conflict which occurs at the beginning of the film. Nevertheless, it does not prevent them from the establishment of good relationships and it is even possible to speak about a strange but strong friendship between these two not very talkative men (Hertzberg, 153). Their friendship grows stronger as they come through all the hardships after the escape from the prison. In such a way, the author shows that human relations are very complicated and it is very difficult to understand what actually makes people help each other and become friends. At first glance, Zack and Jack have no chances to become friends, at least at the beginning of the film, but by the end of the film they cannot be viewed otherwise but friends, even though they do not talk to each other. Consequently, there should something else in humans that makes them feel confident in each other and become friends. In this respect, it is possible to speak about strong post-modernist trends that can be easily traced in the film, especially through the relationship between Zack and Jack. What is meant here is the fact that Jim Jarmusch actually challenges the existing social norms and purely materialistic view on human life. Obviously, he rejects the supremacy of the law as a synonym of justice. Moreover, he even rejects traditional views on human relations and denies the rigid materialism of the conservative or traditional artists. His characters’ friendship cannot be rationally explained by a scientific theory or logic. Traditionally, normal or positive interpersonal relationships are established through verbal communication, but Zack and Jack have none. Instead, it is rather a kind of spiritual unity or spiritual communication between the main characters. In fact, their friendship is, to a certain extent, almost mystical. At any rate, it is irrational and does not meet any scientific approach that is very typical for post-modernist art at large and films in particular. In this respect, it should be said that, being a post-modernist director, Jim Jarmusch is very skeptical about science as well as about existing stereotypes, social norms, and the law (Suarez, 186). Instead, he argues that people are spiritually rich and it is impossible to explain logically and rationally all their actions and behavior. They can make errors and they can suffer from errors of other people or the existing social or justice system, but still they remain people. Basically, it seems as if the director cannot fully understand human beings, this is why he shows that some of their actions are defined by their internal inclinations or spiritual world. At the same time, the entire film may be viewed as a post-modernist protest against the existing social norms, stereotypes and biases, which limit humans by boundaries of social and legal conventions, norms and regulations. In such a context, the successful escape of the main characters from the prison is very symbolic because, in such a way, they escaped from the social biases and stereotypes, they freed themselves not only literally as they got freedom to move wherever they wanted, but they also got moral and spiritual freedom. They escape from the prison of social stereotypes and unjust laws. Moreover, after the escape, Bob even found his love and became happy that implies that only freeing themselves people can become really happy. Thus, taking into account all above mentioned, it is possible to conclude that Jim Jarmusch is a successful post-modernist director, who attempted to convey his original ideas and his unique vision of the world and men through his works, among which it is possible to single out â€Å"Down by Law†. In this work, the author perfectly illustrated the imperfectness of the contemporary world and humans. He lays emphasis on the erroneous nature of the existing laws, stereotypes and traditional views of people which heavily rely on materialism, rationalism and logic. Instead, he appeals to human nature, to human spirituality and he underlines that people should strive for their own freedom from their own biases and stereotypes. People, according to Jim Jarmusch should be really free as are his characters.

The Importance Of Literacy :: Literacy Essays

Rita Mae Brown describes literacy as, "a social contract, an agreed upon representation of certain symbols" (420). If the symbol's (letters) meanings are not agreed upon by those attempting to communicate, then interpreting one another becomes difficult. Simply stated, literacy is very important. Society has proven time and time again, it will reward those individuals who are competent and impede those who are not, whether expressed in terms of employment opportunities (job success) or just on a social level.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  One need look no further than their everyday activities in order to realize how important literary skills are. Without adequate literary skills one may not be able to identify on a label the correct amount of medicine to give a child, or read and interpret a sign giving instructions on what to do in case of a fire. These two examples bring perspective to literacy's importance. Nevertheless, recent surveys have indicated that, "4.5 million Canadians, representing 24 percent of the eighteen-and-over group, can be considered illiterate" ("Adult Illiteracy" 5). Illiteracy is truly a problem within Canada. Although many groups are working to render the problem of illiteracy, much work still lies ahead.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  As our society moves on into the next century literacy is proving vital to economic performance. Without basic literary skills in one's possession they will become lost in our rapidly changing society. The modern worker must be able to adapt to the changing job-scene. This often means gathering new skills and knowledge from printed material, whether instruction manuals, computer programs, or classroom training (text books). It is quite commonly the case that highly skilled jobs require a high level of literacy. Therefore, literary skill level is an important factor in predicting an individual's economic success. It will affect an individual's income, their employment stability and whether they even receive employment opportunities.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Presently, our world revolves around literacy. Simply being literate allows one to continuously upgrade one's literary skills to a higher level. It allows one to stay informed of happenings in and around the world through mediums such as newspapers and magazines. Knowing current news about what is going on in this ever changing world of ours is the key to staying ahead. Another thought to ponder is this, we rely on those with high literacy levels to record and document findings and happenings for future generations to reflect on. These writings would most likely be dull and inaccurate or would not exist at all without our current levels of literacy.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  When viewed from a social standpoint, literacy remains just as important as when viewed from the economic standpoint. Linda Macleod of the National Associations Active in Criminal Justice, points out that, "65 percent of people

Hamlet: The Tragic Hero Essay

Hamlet’s flaw is that he has a hard time carrying out his plans; he does not have the raw passion that enraged Laertes (). Hamlet took time to think about his actions and the consequences for his plans, many times did he think of doing them, yet he did not carry out them out. Hamlet was not a forgetful, evil character, but more of a tragic hero. The beginning of the play sets out the story and the Ghost of Hamlet’s late father reveals the truth about his murder to his son. He tells Hamlet to avenge his death. Hamlet’s response seems like he has quick plans to carry out his fathers wishing, by saying â€Å"Haste me to know’t that I with winds as swift†¦ May sweep to my revenge.† (I v 33-5) Unfortunately, Hamlet’s inability to act on his father’s extortion has him reluctant to kill the King Claudius by the end of that very scene, when he says, â€Å"This time is out of joint, O cursed spite – that I was ever born to set it right.† (I v 206-7) Here, Hamlet is already having doubts and wishing that he wasn’t the one that had to carry out the revenge for his father. Obviously Hamlet has real problems when it comes down to dealing with things. As the play goes on, Hamlet still has not done a thing to avenge his father. In Act II, Scene 2, Hamlet decides that before he can avenge his father’s death, he must make sure that the Ghost was telling the truth. This simply gives Hamlet more excuse to procrastinate. Hamlets play is a parody of the way Claudius killed the previous king and took his wife. When the play is seen by Claudius, Claudius becomes outraged and ends the play. Hamlet knows now that Claudius is guilty. He justifies this inaction by saying â€Å"The spirit I have seen – May be the devil†¦Ã¢â‚¬  He is very firm in his believe of faith and he does not want to be pulled into Hell because of a filthy deed given to him by a demon. However, because of Claudius’ reaction, Hamlet knews the ghost was true. He comments to Horatio, â€Å"I’ll take the ghost’s word for a thousand pound.† In act III, scene 3, Hamlet is ready to kill the king, but stops himself because the king is praying. Again Hamlet’s faith stops him from the horrid act of regicide. Because the king is praying that if he killed him now the  king would go to heaven. He decides yet again to delay avenging his father’s murder, this time until he can kill the King while he is in a vile condition, such as â€Å"When he is drunk asleep; or in his rage; Or in the incestuous pleasure of his bed.† (III iii 92-3) In the end of the play, we see that Hamlet’s inability to act causes his tragic demise. Hamlets failure to revenge his father when he should have, costs him not only his life, but also his mother’s. In the final scene, Hamlet duels with Laertes, who has conspired with the King to kill Hamlet. In the King’s attempt to kill Hamlet, he accidentally poisons the Queen. Laertes delivers the fatal wound to Hamlet with a sword dipped in a deadly poison and it is only with his final life breath that Hamlet finally kills the King. So, Hamlet has finally killed the king, but not by going out and slaying the king while he was involved in â€Å"incestuous sheets† or â€Å"drunk asleep† like he said, but with a poison the king made himself to kill Hamlet. Ultimately, Hamlet avenged his father, and his father’s later wish for the queen to be left to die without Hamlet killing her. However it came at a very heavy cost; Hamlet, Laertes, and Gertrude’s deaths, and Denmark falling into the hands of the Norwegian enemy, Fortinbras.